Nipponica

Japan's central government has yet to adopt a comprehensive national immigration policy despite a rise in foreign workers, leaving government agencies and local governments to handle issues individually, often in a haphazard manner.

The local governments want unified guidance at the national level but Tokyo is dropping the ball. There would be so much benefit and cost savings to centralize this kind of support but no political will to implement. Just another Thursday in Japan.

Hiroyuki Goto ventured into what appeared to be a high-risk business nearly two decades ago when, at the age of 28, he started providing rent guarantees for foreign nationals living in Japan.

Goto's experience suggested that the actual risk of backing a foreign resident might not be unusually high, and he thought that renting a place should not be an obstacle for people coming to Japan. More broadly, he felt it was inevitable that the country would have to accept more foreign workers due to depopulation.

So, he started GTN.

This is one of many areas that make starting a life in Japan so difficult. GTN was the only company that would allow me to open a credit card when I first came here to work and that allowed me to build up my personal infrastructure. This guy is a saint.

While the national government has viewed foreigners as "workers," local governments tend to see them as residents and community members just like Japanese citizens. The association is calling for the establishment of a central organization to oversee multicultural policies, among other measures.

The association calls for establishing a new central organization separate from the Immigration Services Agency, which oversees immigration administration, and for drafting a systematic and comprehensive basic law to underpin national and local multicultural policies. It also highlights the need for the national government to provide financial support for local multicultural coexistence measures and actively spread information on systems that foreign residents need to know.

Very bold proposals especially compared to the usual milquetoast faire from politicians at the national level. It does make sense to have a unified approach to multicultural policies instead of it depending on where you live. The only downside here is that the progressive stance that many cities take, like with LGBT residents, might be reverted if the central government has the reigns.

The rapid ascent of the right-wing Sanseito party in Japan has shone a spotlight on public attitudes to immigration, unnerving some non-Japanese residents.

Sanseito, founded in 2020, won 14 seats in Sunday's upper house election on its "Japanese First" platform advocating stricter rules on immigration and foreign capital, along with proposing tax cuts and welfare spending. The party had held only one seat in the 248-member chamber of parliament prior to the vote.

In a stump speech during the election campaign, party leader Sohei Kamiya called for limits on the number of unskilled foreign workers entering Japan to make up for the nation's labor shortage, which he described as a "national doping scheme."

Nikkei Asia asked a number of foreign residents in Japan to describe their reactions to Sanseito's election performance.

A good roundup of foreign resident's thoughts on this new party.

Japanese ocean shipping group Mitsui O.S.K. Lines is exploring options for sending employees to English-speaking countries other than the U.S., citing the possibility of longer-term impacts.

The company has eight participants in its program, with four each at New York University and University of California, Irvine. They have student visas to take part in three-month programs to study English and business.

"The Trump administration's xenophobic policies will in the long term hurt the free-spirited charm has attracted exceptional young talent from all over the world and has been a U.S. strength," Mitsui O.S.K. Lines chief executive Takeshi Hashimoto said.

The internal affairs ministry plans to survey municipalities about uncollected resident tax from foreigners who leave Japan without paying, in order to consider countermeasures, a government source said Friday.

Workers living in Japan as of Jan. 1 are subject to resident tax for that year. However, it is typically paid in monthly installments from June of the following year and the time lag contributes to the problem, as some foreign workers leave Japan before their payments begin.

The core of the problem here is that municipalities are taxing people on a year delay, not people not paying. It is the first thing in the populist playbook to claim the immigrants aren't paying their fair share, but the answer to this problem is not to punish people when the system itself should be the object of reform. Adopting an immediate resident tax would simplify everything.